http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/business/15bank.html?_r=1&8au&emc=au
It's not as much the fact that Merrill paid bonus that gets to me, but that it seeks to settle the issue for $33m of more shareholder's money. You rob them once.. and oh wait to make up for that rob them twice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment